From: Dag Nygren <dag@newtech.fi>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: dag@newtech.fi
Subject: nanosleep with small value
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:30:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051117163047.30293.qmail@dag.newtech.fi> (raw)
Hi,
seeing a strange thing happening here:
using nanosleep() with a smallish value gives me a very long sleeptime?
Is this because of a context switch being forced?
Shouldn't the scheduler change affect that?
The test program:
===================================
#include <time.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void delay_ns(unsigned long dly)
{
static struct timespec time;
int err;
{
time.tv_sec = 0;
time.tv_nsec = dly;
err = nanosleep(&time, NULL);
if (err) {
perror( "nanosleep failed" );
}
}
}
main()
{
int i;
struct sched_param mysched;
int err;
if ( sched_getparam( 0, &mysched ) != 0 )
perror( "" );
else {
mysched.sched_priority = sched_get_priority_max(SCHED_FIFO);
err = sched_setscheduler(0, SCHED_FIFO, &mysched);
if( err != 0 ) {
fprintf (stderr,"sched_setscheduler returned: %d\n",
err );
perror( "" );
}
}
for (i=0; i < 1000; i++)
delay_ns(1000UL);
}
==================================
The result running this is:
% time ./tst
real 0m8.000s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
I would have expected about 1000 * 1 us + overhead,
but 8 seconds ????
Noticed this when trying to debug a PIC-programming
software where the delay_ns() routine is used.
Increasing the nanosleep() argument to something more than HZ
will give me the expected sleep times.
Best
--
Dag Nygren email: dag@newtech.fi
Oy Espoon NewTech Ab phone: +358 9 8024910
Träsktorpet 3 fax: +358 9 8024916
02360 ESBO Mobile: +358 400 426312
FINLAND
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 16:30 Dag Nygren [this message]
2005-11-17 16:55 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-11-17 17:32 ` Eric Piel
2005-11-17 17:12 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-11-17 18:47 ` Dag Nygren
[not found] <29495f1d0511171051q6088099drfe094817a01668e4@mail.gmail.com>
2005-11-17 19:11 ` Dag Nygren
2005-11-17 19:15 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-17 19:17 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-11-17 19:47 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-11-21 7:12 ` Dag Nygren
2005-11-17 20:25 Dag Nygren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051117163047.30293.qmail@dag.newtech.fi \
--to=dag@newtech.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome