From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161183AbVKSCPh (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:15:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161185AbVKSCPh (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:15:37 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:53228 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161183AbVKSCPg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:15:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:15:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alasdair G Kergon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] device-mapper snapshot: metadata reading separation Message-Id: <20051118181513.31fed24c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20051118150135.GP11878@agk.surrey.redhat.com> References: <20051118150135.GP11878@agk.surrey.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > +static void read_snapshot_metadata(struct dm_snapshot *s) > +{ > + if (s->have_metadata) > + return; > + > + if (s->store.read_metadata(&s->store)) { > + down_write(&s->lock); > + s->valid = 0; > + up_write(&s->lock); > + } > + > + s->have_metadata = 1; > +} > + I always get suspicious when I see a lock around a plain assignment. Sometimes it's legitimate, usually when some other user of the LHS expects its value to be stable across an entire locked region - it is read multiple times and those reads are expected to return the same thing. (I can't think of any other case). Maybe this is such a case?