From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964895AbVKVKWl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:22:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932345AbVKVKWl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:22:41 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44460 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932241AbVKVKWk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:22:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:22:37 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@elte.hu, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 002_usemap Message-ID: <20051122102237.GK20775@brahms.suse.de> References: <20051115164946.21980.2026.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <200511160036.54461.ak@suse.de> <200511160252.05494.ak@suse.de> <4382EF48.1050107@shadowen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4382EF48.1050107@shadowen.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > All of that said, I am not even sure we have a bit left in the page > flags on smaller architectures :/. How about #define PG_checked 8 /* kill me in 2.5.. */ ? At least PG_uncached isn't used on many architectures too, so could be reused. I don't know why those that use it don't check VMAs instead. -Andi