mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Ray Bryant <raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Perfctr-devel] Re: Enabling RDPMC in user space by default
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:13:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051129181344.GN19515@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051129180903.GB6611@frankl.hpl.hp.com>

> Where did you see that PMC0 (PERSEL0/PERFCTR0) can only be programmed
> to count cpu cycles (i.e. cpu_clk_unhalted)? As far as I can tell from
> the documentation, the 4 counters are symetrical and can measure
> any event that the processor offers.

Linux NMI watchdog does that.

All other perfctr users are supposed to keep their fingers away 
from the watchdog (it looks like oprofile doesn't but not for much
longer ...) 

I think it's also a useful convention - RDTSC is becomming more and more
useless and you cannot expect user applications who just want to
measure some cycles to rely on ever changing instable or non existing
performance counter APIs.

> If you look at the perfmon x86-64 patch, you will see that under certain
> circumstances, we enable CR4.pce. The main motivation is to alloc reading
> counters at ring 3 with RDPMC. By default, CR4.pce must be cleared for
> security reasons (covert channel). Perfmon only allows RDPMC for

The same covert channel would exist with RDTSC so that argument is bogus.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-29 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-29 15:15 Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 16:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-11-29 16:17   ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 16:56 ` Ray Bryant
2005-11-29 16:15   ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 18:09   ` [Perfctr-devel] " Stephane Eranian
2005-11-29 18:13     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-11-29 18:29       ` John Reiser
2005-11-29 18:38         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 19:05         ` Lee Revell
2005-11-29 21:43       ` Nicholas Miell
2005-11-29 21:52         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 22:19           ` Stephane Eranian
2005-11-29 22:51             ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-11-30 16:01               ` Stephane Eranian
2005-11-30 16:23                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-01 23:41                   ` Stephane Eranian
2005-12-02  0:07                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-02  7:09                       ` Stephane Eranian
2005-12-02 11:36                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 22:33           ` Nicholas Miell
2005-11-29 22:43             ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 23:02               ` Nicholas Miell
2005-11-29 23:17                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 23:29                   ` Nicholas Miell
2005-11-29 23:39                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 23:56                       ` David Gibson
2005-11-30  0:34                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-30  0:52                           ` David Gibson
2005-11-30  1:04                             ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-11-30  0:50                       ` Ray Bryant
2005-11-30  0:38                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-30  7:38                     ` Stephane Eranian
2005-11-30  8:22                       ` Nicholas Miell
2005-11-30 15:48                         ` Stephane Eranian
2005-11-29 23:07               ` David Gibson
2005-11-29 23:18                 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 23:28               ` Bernd Schmidt
2005-11-29 23:46                 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-11-30  2:39 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-11-30  3:38   ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-01  4:08     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-12-01 13:05       ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-01 17:01         ` Zwane Mwaikambo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051129181344.GN19515@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=raybry@mpdtxmail.amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®