From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ssant@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Adding ctrl-o sysrq hack support to 8250 driver
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051130130429.GB25032@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438D8A3A.9030400@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:47:14PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> The following patch will allow a user to use sysrq keys over a serial
> console using the ctrl-o key sequence. This is similar to functionality
> provided by the hvc console drivers on PPC boxes.
Several problems:
1. ^O is normally the "flush" control code, for discarding unsent output.
2. ^O might be inadvertantly received due to a connected PC trying to
auto-detect connected devices.
3. see review below.
> diff -Naurp linux-2.6.14.3/drivers/serial/8250.c linux-2.6.14.3-new/drivers/serial/8250.c
> --- linux-2.6.14.3/drivers/serial/8250.c 2005-11-11 11:03:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.14.3-new/drivers/serial/8250.c 2005-11-17 15:12:42.000000000 +0530
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,23 @@ receive_chars(struct uart_8250_port *up,
> */
> }
> ch = serial_inp(up, UART_RX);
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ) && defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE)
> + /* Handle the SysRq ^O Hack */
> + if (ch == '\x0f') {
> + up->port.sysrq = jiffies + HZ*5;
Why are you doing this and not using uart_handle_break()?
Do you realise that this enables sysrq support for _any_ 8250 serial
port, be it console or not?
> + goto ignore_char;
> + }
> + if (up->port.sysrq) {
> + int swallow;
> + spin_unlock(&up->port.lock);
> + swallow = uart_handle_sysrq_char(&up->port, ch, regs);
> + spin_lock(&up->port.lock);
We don't drop the lock when calling uart_handle_sysrq_char() further
down in this function. Why is this needed? Also, why is this needed
to be duplicated?
> + if (swallow)
> + goto ignore_char;
> + }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ && CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE */
> +
> flag = TTY_NORMAL;
> up->port.icount.rx++;
>
Sorry, NACK.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-30 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-30 11:17 Sachin Sant
2005-11-30 12:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-30 13:04 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-12-06 6:48 ` Sachin Sant
2005-12-06 17:16 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 6:31 ` Sachin Sant
2005-12-07 22:22 ` Olaf Hering
2005-12-07 23:39 ` Russell King
2005-12-08 14:58 ` Olaf Hering
2005-12-08 1:38 Milton Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051130130429.GB25032@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ssant@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome