From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
Luvella McFadden <luvella@us.ibm.com>,
AJ Johnson <blujuice@us.ibm.com>,
Kevin Stansell <kstansel@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Mauelshagen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic79xx should be able to ignore HostRAID enabledadapters
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:49:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051201174928.GA13196@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F01E3E359@otce2k03.adaptec.com>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven [mailto:arjan@infradead.org] writes:
> > adaptec could just release the source of the enhancement to linux (as
> > the GPL basically requires anyway :)
>
> Adaptec did, it was called emd! <ouch>
While the project was a total failure in every respect it at least allows
us to have an open description of the format. Thanks to Adaptec that we
at least have it, although an open spec would have an a lot easier way
to get that information out :) But honestly just another raid format
is not really something you'll get us excited about, there are far too
many of them already.
If you actually published the raid sequencer code I'm pretty sure someone
would have picked up the shards of the emd project and turned it into
something useful. I would have loved to play with that kind of thing for
certain.
> I know, a circular argument ... Regardless this burned out three of the
> most talented engineers at Adaptec working on that project. None of them
> will probably ever contribute to Linux again, they are all now
> Luminaries in the FreeBSD community.
I'm pretty happy that we never have to deal with Justin or Scott again,
as it saves a considerable amount of my time.
(and btw, they've been freebsd commiters and core members long before
adaptec assigned them to do linux work, which probably was a part
of the cultural problems when dealing with them)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-01 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-01 14:21 Salyzyn, Mark
2005-12-01 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051201174928.GA13196@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Mauelshagen@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=blujuice@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kstansel@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luvella@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®