From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6.15-rc1+ regression] do_file_page bug introduced in recent rework
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:11:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512020111.56671.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
I recently found a bug introduced in your commit
65500d234e74fc4e8f18e1a429bc24e51e75de4a, i.e. between 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc1,
about do_file_page changes wrt remap_file_pages and MAP_POPULATE.
Quoting from the changelog (which is wrong):
do_file_page's fallback to do_no_page dates from a time when we were
testing
pte_file by using it wherever possible: currently it's peculiar to
nonlinear
vmas, so just check that. BUG_ON if not? Better not, it's probably page
table corruption, so just show the pte: hmm, there's a pte_ERROR macro,
let's
use that for do_wp_page's invalid pfn too.
This is false:
do_mmap_pgoff:
if (flags & MAP_POPULATE) {
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
sys_remap_file_pages(addr, len, 0,
pgoff, flags & MAP_NONBLOCK);
down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
}
So, with MAP_POPULATE|MAP_NONBLOCK passed, you can get a linear PAGE_FILE pte
in a !VM_NONLINEAR vma.
That PTE is very useless since it doesn't add any information, I know that, so
avoiding that possible installation is a possible fix, but for now it's
simpler to change the test in do_file_page(). Btw, in fact I discovered this
bug while I was implementing this optimization (working again on
remap_file_pages() patches of this summer).
Indeed, the condition to test (and to possibly BUG_ON/pte_ERROR) is that
->populate must exist for the sys_remap_file_pages call to work.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-03 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 0:11 Blaisorblade [this message]
2005-12-03 10:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-03 12:06 ` Sorry (was: Re: [2.6.15-rc1+ regression] do_file_page bug introduced in recent rework) Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200512020111.56671.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®