From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964926AbVLFCRt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:17:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964925AbVLFCRt (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:17:49 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:26076 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964912AbVLFCRs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:17:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:17:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20051205.181732.34234732.davem@davemloft.net> To: trizt@iname.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sparc: Kernel 2.6.13 to 2.6.15-rc2 bug when running X11 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "J.O. Aho" Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 03:04:11 +0100 (CET) > The dmesg entry comes from 2.6.15-rc2, but is kind of the same, expect not > all versions has the ugly and annoying face. 1) Lots of problems have been fixed that trigger that bug message, please give 2.6.15-rc5 a spin. 2) You didn't give what the failure mode is for kernels such as 2.6.14.2, which should work, and certainly don't print out that bug message 3) Finally, this discussion belongs on sparclinux@vger.kernel.org (CC'd), not linux-kernel.