mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Reduce number of pointer derefs in various files (kernel/exit.c used as example)
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:14:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512090914.21436.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051209014658.GA11856@waste.org>

Am Freitag, 9. Dezember 2005 02:46 schrieb Matt Mackall:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:15:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ohh, and before I forget, besides the fact that this should speed 
> > > things up a little bit it also has the added benefit of reducing the 
> > > size of the generated code. The original kernel/exit.o file was 19604 
> > > bytes in size, the patched one is 19508 bytes in size.
> > 
> > nice. Just to underline your point, on x86, with gcc 4.0.2, i'm getting 
> > this with your patch:
> > 
> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> >   11077       0       0   11077    2b45 exit.o.orig
> >   10997       0       0   10997    2af5 exit.o
> > 
> > so 80 bytes shaved off. I think such patches also increase readability.
> 
> Readability improved: good.
> 37 lines of patch for 80-100 bytes saved: not so good.
> 
> So while this is a good style direction, I don't think it's worth the
> churn. And unlike kzalloc and the like, this particular optimization
> is perfectly doable by a compiler. So I'd rather wait for the compiler
> to get smarter than change code for such modest improvements.

How can the compiler do it? If a function call is between two evaluations
of a pointer chain, the compiler would have to make sure no pointer in
the chain is touched. For the case of a computed function call, it is
impossible in principle.

	Regards
		Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-09  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-06 22:02 Jesper Juhl
2005-12-06 22:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-09  1:46   ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-09  8:14     ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2005-12-09 18:22       ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-09 10:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-09 18:34       ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200512090914.21436.oliver@neukum.org \
    --to=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome