From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751156AbVLLGY2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:24:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751157AbVLLGY2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:24:28 -0500 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:61094 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751156AbVLLGY1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:24:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:24:04 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: akpm@osdl.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net, davej@redhat.com, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, ak@suse.de, ashok.raj@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack Message-Id: <20051211222404.d35f990c.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20051211232428.18286.40968.sendpatchset@sam.engr.sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.7 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric wrote: > Taking a quick glance at alpha causes me to think we always > want pm_power_off to be non null on alpha. So I presume you think that some alpha person should write such a function? I can't quite guess whether you are agreeing with my patch, or disagreeing with it. At the very least, I don't want to leave the crosstools build of alpha with a default config broken. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401