mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dada1@cosmosbay.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:22:12 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221.012212.65592069.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A91C57.20102@cosmosbay.com>

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:11:51 +0100

> Could some of you post the result of the following command on your machines :

sparc64, PAGE_SIZE=8192, L1_CACHE_BYTES=32

size-131072            0      0 131072  
size-65536            13     13  65536  
size-32768             2      2  32768  
size-16384             2      2  16384  
size-8192             67     67   8192  
size-4096             75     76   4096  
size-2048            303    308   2048  
size-1024            176    176   1024  
size-512             251    255    512  
size-256             217    217    256  
size-192            1230   1230    192  
size-128             106    122    128  
size-96             1098   1134     96  
size-64            29387  30226     64  

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-21  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-21  8:00 [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0 Junio C Hamano
2005-12-21  9:11 ` [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ? Eric Dumazet
2005-12-21  9:22   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-12-21 10:03     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-12-21  9:46   ` Alok kataria
2005-12-21 12:44   ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-12-21 13:20     ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-21 13:38       ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-21 14:09         ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-21 16:40           ` Dave Jones
2005-12-21 19:36             ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-28  8:32   ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-12-28  8:54     ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-12-28 17:57       ` Andreas Kleen
2005-12-28 21:01         ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-29  1:26           ` Dave Jones
2005-12-30  4:06             ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-02  8:46               ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-02  8:51                 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-02 12:33                   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-02 12:31                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-29  1:29           ` Dave Jones
2005-12-29  1:50             ` Keith Owens
2005-12-29  2:39               ` Dave Jones
2006-01-02 15:03                 ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-04  5:26               ` Dave Jones
2005-12-30 21:13           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-12-31 20:13             ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-29 19:48         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-29 21:16           ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02  8:37         ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-02 12:45           ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 13:04             ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-01-02 13:56               ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 15:09                 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-01-02 15:46                 ` Jörn Engel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051221.012212.65592069.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome