mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-core.patch
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:59:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221155934.GB7375@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A98101.364DB5CF@tv-sign.ru>


* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> wrote:

> > +__mutex_wakeup_waiter(struct mutex *lock __IP_DECL__)
> > +{
> > +	struct mutex_waiter *waiter;
> > ...
> > +	if (!waiter->woken) {
> > +		waiter->woken = 1;
> > +		wake_up_process(waiter->ti->task);
> > +	}
> 
> Is it optimization? If yes - why? From mutex.h:
> 
> 	- only one task can hold the mutex at a time
> 	- only the owner can unlock the mutex
> 
> So, how can this help?

yes, it's an optimization. I've removed it from the latest queue because 
it didnt trigger all that often, but the optimization is valid: while we 
have a 'waiter in flight', another (fast) task might grab the mutex, and 
might release it - in which case it could attempt to wake up the waiter 
again - which this flag optimizes.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-21 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-19  1:37 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19  3:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19  4:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19  4:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19  4:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19  5:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19  5:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19  5:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:43   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19  5:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-21 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-21 15:57   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 17:51     ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-21 18:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 15:59   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-12-21 16:02   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051221155934.GB7375@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®