mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Singer <elf@buici.com>
To: Axel Kittenberger <axel.kernel@kittenberger.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:37:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051222173704.GB23411@buici.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512221352.23393.axel.kernel@kittenberger.net>

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:52:23PM +0100, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> Hello, Whom do I talk to about acceptance of Patches in the Bootloader?
> 
> I have seen, and coded once some time ago for priv. uses, do infalte the 
> gziped linux kernel at boottime in "arch/i386/boot/compressed/misc.c" and " 
> windowlib/inflate.c" the deflation algorthimn uses a 32k backtrack window. 
> Whenever it is full, it copies it .... into the memory. 
> 
> While this window makes a lot of sense in an userspace application like 
> gunzip, it does not make a lot sense in the bootloader. As userspace 
> application the window is flushed to a file when full. The bootloader 
> "flushes" it to memory (copies it in memory). That 1 time copy of the whole 
> kernel can be optimized away, since we do not keep track of a window since 
> the inflater can read what it has written right in the computer memory, while 
> it unpacks the kernel.
> 
> What would the optimization be worth? 
> * A faster uncompressing of the kernel, since a total 1-time memcopy of the 
> whole kernel is been optimized away.

Have you timed this operation?  I would predict that the time to copy
the kernel is nominal as compared the the time taken to perform the
decompression.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-22 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-22 12:52 Axel Kittenberger
2005-12-22 17:37 ` Marc Singer [this message]
2005-12-22 18:12   ` Axel Kittenberger
2005-12-22 18:30     ` Marc Singer
2005-12-22 19:04       ` Axel Kittenberger
2005-12-23  8:53         ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-12-24 21:38           ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-12-25 21:01       ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-25 21:10         ` Axel Kittenberger
2005-12-25 21:17           ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-12-26  2:15 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-12-26 16:00   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051222173704.GB23411@buici.com \
    --to=elf@buici.com \
    --cc=axel.kernel@kittenberger.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®