From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161074AbVLWWZ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:25:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161077AbVLWWZ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:25:26 -0500 Received: from smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.32]:2457 "HELO smtp001.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161074AbVLWWZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:25:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=ysz8yWLS5wddDz5rWV0+HUVkt7Rpd3MkN/zJRfzYIDvf11igZW8emWIkdUR3buiF5/y0LCmF/6athMQaEyE56ndA+8oM2fNmiMMDB4iOeagzQBRTLOmg1dzmyqa1BgJpWBX+97dACGJWzPJeBUnmUsvESIdUibpAXwYgoWf50r8= ; From: Blaisorblade To: Greg KH Subject: Re: 2.6.14.3 - sysfs duplicated dentry bug Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:25:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: LKML References: <200512091848.42297.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20051209175555.GA9761@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20051209175555.GA9761@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512232325.12849.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 09 December 2005 18:55, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 06:48:41PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Q: Since when is a directory entry allowed to be duplicate? > > A: Since Linux 2.6.14! > > > > $ uname -r > > 2.6.14.3-bs2-mroute > > > > The only sysfs-related change is the use of a custom DSDT, which is new > > to this kernel. > Known bug, fixed in the 2.6.15-rc kernel tree. It was a timer > registering with the same name in two places :( Sorry for answering so late (my latency in checking "spam" false positives is big) but shouldn't this have been backported to -stable? Also is this known to cause hangs at unmount time (I experience them at times and they're not network FSs-related) ? > And yes, we should have more sysfs checks for stuff like this, any > patches in this area would be greatly appreciated. No idea about all kfoo stuff at the present moment^H^H^H year, sorry. Can't help. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it