From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751086AbVLZWbG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:31:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751088AbVLZWbG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:31:06 -0500 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:65407 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751086AbVLZWbE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:31:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:00:28 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC] Remove EXPERIMENTAL for module versioning Message-ID: <20051226220028.GA31328@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Module versioning has since early 2.5 been marked EXPERIMENTAL. But except for one recent bug fixed already fixed by Robin Holt I have had no mails about this feature for a long time. So it is to be considered a stable feature and it will have the EXPERIMENTAL mark removed. Let me know if you disagree. Sam diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index ea097e0..11930fb 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -460,8 +460,8 @@ config OBSOLETE_MODPARM If unsure, say Y. config MODVERSIONS - bool "Module versioning support (EXPERIMENTAL)" - depends on MODULES && EXPERIMENTAL + bool "Module versioning support" + depends on MODULES help Usually, you have to use modules compiled with your kernel. Saying Y here makes it sometimes possible to use modules