From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __memcpy_toio32
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:44:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051230234400.GM3356@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051230234628.GB3811@stusta.de>
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 12:46:28AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 08:51:14AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 06:40:03AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 17:10 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the principle of least surprise calls for memcpy_toio32 to be
> > > > ordered the same way memcpy_toio is. In other words there should be a
> > > > wmb() after the loop.
> > >
> > > Will do.
> > >
> > > > Also, no need for the { } for the while loop.
> > >
> > > Fine. There doesn't seem to be much consistency in whether to use
> > > curlies for single-line blocks.
> >
> > We've been very consistent in discouraging it in new code. Enforcement
> > of fine points of coding style is a post-2.5 phenomenon, so it hasn't
> > hit all the tree yet.
> >
> > > > You're adding this symbol and exporting it even if the arch will
> > > > supply its own version. So this is pure kernel .text bloat...
> > >
> > > I don't know what you'd prefer, so let me enumerate a few alternatives,
> > > and you can either tell me which you'd prefer, or point out something
> > > I've missed that would be even better. I'm entirely flexible on this.
> > >
> > > * Use the __HAVE_ARCH_* mechanism that include/asm-*/string.h
> > > uses. Caveat: Linus has lately come out as hating this style.
> > > It makes for the smallest patch, though.
> > > * Define the generic code in lib/, and have each arch that really
> > > uses it export it.
> >
> > I'd favor this, at least for this case. If it becomes more widely
> > used, we'll relocate the export.
> >...
>
> I don't like this for two reasons:
> - we are moving exports to the actual functions and steadily killing all
> *syms* files
> - the lib-y approach has the disadvantage of completely omitting the
> function if it's used only in modules resulting in non-working
> modules
>
> Where's the problem with the __HAVE_ARCH_* mechanism?
The head penguin peed on it last week.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-30 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-27 23:41 [PATCH 0 of 3] Add memcpy_toio32, a 32-bit MMIO copy routine Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-27 23:41 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __memcpy_toio32 Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-28 1:10 ` Roland Dreier
2005-12-28 14:40 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-28 14:51 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-30 23:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-30 23:44 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2005-12-31 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31 0:31 ` (OT) " Jan Engelhardt
2005-12-31 0:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31 21:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-28 19:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-12-28 1:11 ` Roland Dreier
2005-12-28 4:07 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 3:52 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 14:47 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-28 14:55 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 15:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-28 15:52 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-27 23:41 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] memcpy32 for x86_64 Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-28 4:22 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 7:54 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-12-28 14:52 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-01-06 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 16:02 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-12-27 23:41 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] Add memcpy_toio32 to each arch Bryan O'Sullivan
[not found] <200512280603.jBS63WGB031117@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
2005-12-28 6:20 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __memcpy_toio32 Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051230234400.GM3356@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bos@pathscale.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome