From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965191AbWADHbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 02:31:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965219AbWADHbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 02:31:52 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:42159 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965191AbWADHbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 02:31:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:31:27 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: pavel@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/3] mm: add a new function (needed for swap suspend) Message-Id: <20060103233127.26328cba.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200512271752.47003.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200512271747.43374.rjw@sisk.pl> <200512271752.47003.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > @@ -211,6 +211,26 @@ > return (swp_entry_t) {0}; > } > > +swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int type) > +{ > + struct swap_info_struct *si; > + pgoff_t offset; > + > + spin_lock(&swap_lock); > + si = swap_info + type; > + if (si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK) { > + nr_swap_pages--; > + offset = scan_swap_map(si); > + if (offset) { > + spin_unlock(&swap_lock); > + return swp_entry(type, offset); > + } > + nr_swap_pages++; > + } > + spin_unlock(&swap_lock); > + return (swp_entry_t) {0}; > +} A little introductory comment would have been nice.. Would it be appropriate to put this under CONFIG_SOMETHING to save a little space?