From: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: dmlb2000@gmail.com
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rt1
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:43:01 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104.014301.113325512.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c21eeae0601032316l3259fbecle6a0b290ed244e12@mail.gmail.com>
In article <9c21eeae0601032316l3259fbecle6a0b290ed244e12@mail.gmail.com> (at Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:16:02 -0800), David Brown <dmlb2000@gmail.com> says:
> patch-2.6.15-rt1-1 has the ipv6 patch yet is smaller than the initial
> patch. I created the patch using:
> $ diff -uprN linux-2.6.15 linux-2.6.15-rt1 > patch-2.6.15-rt1-1
>
> Is this not the way you did it? I noticed different headers in my
> patch vs. the patch posted. Really I'm concerned about missing
> anything in the patch, considering it's 700+ lines smaller.
I have linux-2.6 git tree and I did something like this:
$ cd linux-2.6
$ patch -p1 < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1
hack, hack, hack...
$ patch -p1 -R < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1
$ git reset
$ git diff
--yoshfuji
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-03 9:47 2.6.15-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-01-03 11:21 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-01-03 11:27 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-01-03 11:34 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-01-03 14:33 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Florian Schmidt
2006-01-03 15:13 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Florian Schmidt
2006-01-03 18:40 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-03 18:56 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-04 0:01 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Florian Schmidt
2006-01-04 0:24 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-04 14:31 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-03 23:12 ` 2.6.15-rt1 David Brown
2006-01-03 23:29 ` 2.6.15-rt1 David Brown
2006-01-04 2:24 ` 2.6.15-rt1 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2006-01-04 7:16 ` 2.6.15-rt1 David Brown
2006-01-04 7:43 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [this message]
2006-01-04 7:50 ` 2.6.15-rt1 David Brown
2006-01-04 21:01 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Willy Tarreau
2006-01-05 20:52 ` 2.6.15-rt1 James Cloos
2006-01-05 21:00 ` 2.6.15-rt1 David Brown
2006-01-10 22:17 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Esben Stien
2006-01-11 3:09 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2006-01-11 10:16 ` 2.6.15-rt1 Esben Stien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060104.014301.113325512.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=dmlb2000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®