mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nuno Monteiro <nuno+lkml@itsari.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Roberto Nibali <ratz@drugphish.ch>,
	"Leonard Milcin Jr." <leonard.milcin@post.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: keyboard driver of 2.6 kernel
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:28:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060106102848.GA6854@hobbes.itsari.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601060752110.22809@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (from jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de on Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:01:26 +0000)


On 2006.01.06 07:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> >> rid of the extra fluff -- the dependency on moduleparm.h which
> >> doesn't exit in 2.4.22
> 
> Good to know.

IIRC, it was introduced in 2.4.25. Since I'm still running 2.4.22, and
since I also didn't need the 2.6 module_param() stuff, I just ripped it
out.

> >> the BSD defines
> 
> In the kernel part? Where?

Not in the driver itself, of course, in rpl_ioctl.h and rpl_packet.h.

> >> the 2.6 defines, etc. Also, if built as a
> >> module, it'll be called 'rpl' instead of 'rpldev'.
> >
> > Why?
> 
> By default, it's called rpldev everywhere.

Yeah, it was just my personal preference. That, and the fact that I
don't know the build system very well, and the O_TARGET and the obj-y
couldn't have the same name. So I opted to make O_TARGET simply rpl.o.
Since the driver you ship in the ttyrpld tarball can only be built
modular, this doesn't affect you anyway :-)

 
> I will have 2.4 put back in.

That'd be great, thanks! A great deal of people are still running 2.4 on
their production servers, and no intention to upgrade anytime soon. If
it's not broken... :-)

Thanks for this tool, by the way, I for one find it very useful!


Regards,

		Nuno

-- 
Nuno Monteiro <nuno+spamtrap@itsari.org> pgp key 8DEF0334

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-04  8:32 P.Manohar
2006-01-04  8:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-04  9:07   ` Leonard Milcin Jr.
2006-01-04  9:23     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-05 10:08       ` [OT] " Roberto Nibali
2006-01-05 11:51         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-05 12:43           ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-05 21:07             ` Nuno Monteiro
2006-01-05 23:28               ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-06  7:01                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-06 10:28                   ` Nuno Monteiro [this message]
2006-01-05 11:58         ` Leonard Milcin Jr.
2006-01-05 12:47           ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-04 16:25   ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060106102848.GA6854@hobbes.itsari.org \
    --to=nuno+lkml@itsari.org \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=leonard.milcin@post.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ratz@drugphish.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®