From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161043AbWAGX10 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:27:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161052AbWAGX10 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:27:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:10959 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161043AbWAGX1Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:27:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:27:00 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: pavel@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface Message-Id: <20060107152700.692c52e7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200601072156.25876.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200601071328.39707.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060107052049.43ded9fd.akpm@osdl.org> <200601071457.54112.rjw@sisk.pl> <200601072156.25876.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > Could you please see if this looks better than the previous one? > I think so. I guess we should wrap the swapfile.c functions in CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND though.