From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161182AbWAHK7K (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:59:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161184AbWAHK7K (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:59:10 -0500 Received: from anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([83.17.87.141]:59537 "EHLO anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161182AbWAHK7J (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:59:09 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] swsusp: low level interface Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:00:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: pavel@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200601071328.39707.rjw@sisk.pl> <200601072156.25876.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060107152700.692c52e7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060107152700.692c52e7.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601081200.36308.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 8 January 2006 00:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > > Could you please see if this looks better than the previous one? > > > > I think so. I guess we should wrap the swapfile.c functions in > CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND though. I'll do that and I'll resend the patches in a new thread.