From: Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH]Kprobes:Fix unloading of self probed module
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:40:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060109144041.A29700@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
[PATCH] Fix unloading of self probed module
When a kprobes modules is written in such a way that
probes are inserted on itself, then unload of that
moudle was not possible due to reference couning on
the same module.
The below patch makes a check and incrementes
the module refcount only if it is not a self
probed module.
We need to allow modules to probe themself -e.g.
kprobes performance measurements
This patch has been tested on several x86_64, ppc64
and IA64 architectures.
Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy>
-------------------------------------------------------
include/linux/kprobes.h | 3 +++
kernel/kprobes.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.15-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-mm1.orig/include/linux/kprobes.h
+++ linux-2.6.15-mm1/include/linux/kprobes.h
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ struct kprobe {
/* list of kprobes for multi-handler support */
struct list_head list;
+
+ /* Indicates that the corresponding module has been ref counted */
+ unsigned int mod_refcounted;
/*count the number of times this probe was temporarily disarmed */
unsigned long nmissed;
Index: linux-2.6.15-mm1/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-mm1.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux-2.6.15-mm1/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -449,19 +449,32 @@ static int __kprobes in_kprobes_function
return 0;
}
-int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+static int __kprobes __register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
+ unsigned long called_from)
{
int ret = 0;
struct kprobe *old_p;
- struct module *mod;
+ struct module *probed_mod;
if ((!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr)) ||
in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr))
return -EINVAL;
- if ((mod = module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr)) &&
- (unlikely(!try_module_get(mod))))
- return -EINVAL;
+ p->mod_refcounted = 0;
+ /* Check are we probing a module */
+ if ((probed_mod = module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr))) {
+ struct module *calling_mod = module_text_address(called_from);
+ /* We must allow modules to probe themself and
+ * in this case avoid incrementing the module refcount,
+ * so as to allow unloading of self probing modules.
+ */
+ if (calling_mod && (calling_mod != probed_mod)) {
+ if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ p->mod_refcounted = 1;
+ } else
+ probed_mod = NULL;
+ }
p->nmissed = 0;
down(&kprobe_mutex);
@@ -483,11 +496,17 @@ int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kpr
out:
up(&kprobe_mutex);
- if (ret && mod)
- module_put(mod);
+ if (ret && probed_mod)
+ module_put(probed_mod);
return ret;
}
+int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return __register_kprobe(p,
+ (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
+}
+
void __kprobes unregister_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
struct module *mod;
@@ -524,7 +543,8 @@ valid_p:
up(&kprobe_mutex);
synchronize_sched();
- if ((mod = module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr)))
+ if (p->mod_refcounted &&
+ (mod = module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr)))
module_put(mod);
if (cleanup_p) {
@@ -547,7 +567,8 @@ int __kprobes register_jprobe(struct jpr
jp->kp.pre_handler = setjmp_pre_handler;
jp->kp.break_handler = longjmp_break_handler;
- return register_kprobe(&jp->kp);
+ return __register_kprobe(&jp->kp,
+ (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0));
}
void __kprobes unregister_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
@@ -587,7 +608,8 @@ int __kprobes register_kretprobe(struct
rp->nmissed = 0;
/* Establish function entry probe point */
- if ((ret = register_kprobe(&rp->kp)) != 0)
+ if ((ret = __register_kprobe(&rp->kp,
+ (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0))) != 0)
free_rp_inst(rp);
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2006-01-09 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060109144041.A29700@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome