From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HPET RTC emulation: add watchdog timer
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:15:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060109161529.GA22353@turing.informatik.uni-halle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060109154350.GA22126@turing.informatik.uni-halle.de>
OK, this time with Signed-off line ...
To prevent the emulated RTC timer from stopping when interrupts are
disabled for too long, implement the watchdog timer to restart it when
needed.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/i386/kernel/time_hpet.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/i386/kernel/time_hpet.c 2006-01-06 16:11:10.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/i386/kernel/time_hpet.c 2006-01-08 21:31:55.000000000 +0100
@@ -413,9 +413,45 @@ int hpet_set_periodic_freq(unsigned long
int hpet_rtc_dropped_irq(void)
{
+ unsigned int cnt, ticks_per_int, lost_ints;
+
if (!is_hpet_enabled())
return 0;
+ if (UIE_on | PIE_on | AIE_on) {
+ /*
+ * The interrupt handler schedules the next interrupt at a
+ * constant offset from the time the current interrupt was
+ * scheduled, without regard to the actual time. When the
+ * handler is delayed too long, it tries to schedule the next
+ * interrupt in the past and the hardware would not interrupt
+ * until the counter had wrapped around. We catch it here.
+ */
+ cnt = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER);
+ /* was the comparator set to a time in the past? */
+ if ((int)(cnt - hpet_t1_cmp) > 0) {
+ /* determine how many interrupts were actually lost */
+ ticks_per_int = (hpet_tick * HZ) / hpet_rtc_int_freq;
+ lost_ints = (cnt - hpet_t1_cmp) / ticks_per_int + 1;
+ /*
+ * Make sure that, even with the time needed to execute
+ * this code, the next scheduled interrupt has been
+ * moved back to the future.
+ */
+ lost_ints++;
+
+ cnt = hpet_t1_cmp + lost_ints * ticks_per_int;
+ hpet_writel(cnt, HPET_T1_CMP);
+ hpet_t1_cmp = cnt;
+
+ if (PIE_on)
+ PIE_count += lost_ints;
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "rtc: lost some interrupts"
+ " at %ldHz.\n", hpet_rtc_int_freq);
+ }
+ }
+
return 1;
}
Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c 2006-01-06 16:11:13.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c 2006-01-08 21:42:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -1234,9 +1234,45 @@ int hpet_set_periodic_freq(unsigned long
int hpet_rtc_dropped_irq(void)
{
+ unsigned int cnt, ticks_per_int, lost_ints;
+
if (!is_hpet_enabled())
return 0;
+ if (UIE_on | PIE_on | AIE_on) {
+ /*
+ * The interrupt handler schedules the next interrupt at a
+ * constant offset from the time the current interrupt was
+ * scheduled, without regard to the actual time. When the
+ * handler is delayed too long, it tries to schedule the next
+ * interrupt in the past and the hardware would not interrupt
+ * until the counter had wrapped around. We catch it here.
+ */
+ cnt = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER);
+ /* was the comparator set to a time in the past? */
+ if ((int)(cnt - hpet_t1_cmp) > 0) {
+ /* determine how many interrupts were actually lost */
+ ticks_per_int = (hpet_tick * HZ) / hpet_rtc_int_freq;
+ lost_ints = (cnt - hpet_t1_cmp) / ticks_per_int + 1;
+ /*
+ * Make sure that, even with the time needed to execute
+ * this code, the next scheduled interrupt has been
+ * moved back to the future.
+ */
+ lost_ints++;
+
+ cnt = hpet_t1_cmp + lost_ints * ticks_per_int;
+ hpet_writel(cnt, HPET_T1_CMP);
+ hpet_t1_cmp = cnt;
+
+ if (PIE_on)
+ PIE_count += lost_ints;
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "rtc: lost some interrupts"
+ " at %ldHz.\n", hpet_rtc_int_freq);
+ }
+ }
+
return 1;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-09 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-09 15:43 Clemens Ladisch
2006-01-09 16:15 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2006-01-09 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-09 18:00 ` lkml
2006-01-09 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-10 8:27 ` Clemens Ladisch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060109161529.GA22353@turing.informatik.uni-halle.de \
--to=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®