From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: Problems with 2.6.15-mm1 and mm2.
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:46:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060109164653.23b2676e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43C2FA2E.2040704@google.com>
Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com> wrote:
>
> >>from the NUMA-Q. http://test.kernel.org/19793/debug/console.log
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes, I asked Greg about that - we don't know what's causing it yet. I have
> > a bad feeling that this bug will go into Linus's tree if we don't fix it
> > quick.
> >
> > I had problems with gregkh-pci-x86-pci-domain-support-the-meat.patch. It
> > might be worth reverting that.
>
> Andy figured out what caused it.
>
> >>on -mm2 I get the x86_64 seems to lock up (NFI why ... looking at it),
> >>the NUMA-Q and x440 panic (very similar to the above).
> >>
> >>I think Andy figured out what was causing those panics. Can we drop
> >>those patches until they're fixed?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I'm not aware of any buggy x86_64 patches in -mm2 :(
> >
> > I guess you don't have the time to sit down and do a bisection search.
> > It'd take a solid few hours...
>
> It's more that I don't have direct access to the machines in question
> any more. The x86_64 one might just be a machine issue ... trying to
> confirm that still ... but the PCI one was real.
>
> M.
>
> Below is cut & pasted, so not applyable, and maybe it shouldn't be
> applied. But ... it worked before whatever is in -mm ... so my personal
> feeling is that if we don't have a fix for whatever is currently in -mm,
> it should get dropped until we do ? Going backwards = bad.
>
> Perhaps I'm in a time loop, and just confused. but I don't think so ?
This isn't at all clear, sorry.
Does the patch you sent fix things in 2.6.15-mm2? On NUMAQ and on x86_64?
Does it fix a bug which was introduced in a patch which in in 2.6.15-mm2?
If so, which one?
etc ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-10 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-09 17:59 Martin Bligh
2006-01-09 23:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-10 0:05 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-10 0:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-01-10 0:50 ` Martin Bligh
2006-01-10 14:52 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060109164653.23b2676e.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome