From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751038AbWAJKId (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:08:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751039AbWAJKId (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:08:33 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56992 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751037AbWAJKIc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:08:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:08:39 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeff Garzik Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to completion: SX8 Message-ID: <20060110100839.GA24106@elte.hu> References: <200601100207.k0A27B4J007573@hera.kernel.org> <43C31F08.304@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C31F08.304@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeff Garzik wrote: > Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > >tree c45749fcb6f8f22d9e2666135b528c885856aaed > >parent 7892f2f48d165a34b0b8130c8a195dfd807b8cb6 > >author Steven Rostedt Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:59:26 -0800 > >committer Ingo Molnar Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:59:26 > >-0800 > > > >[PATCH] mutex subsystem, semaphore to completion: SX8 > > > >change SX8 semaphores to completions. > > > >Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > > Please at least CC the maintainer (me) _sometime_ before pushing > upstream, when you modify a driver... sorry, my bad - this patch grew out of -rt where it initially was a quick hack and then found its way into the mutex tree. Should i send a reverse patch to Linus, or is this change fine with you? Ingo