From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964961AbWAML0P (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:26:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964930AbWAML0P (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:26:15 -0500 Received: from anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([83.17.87.141]:38843 "EHLO anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964961AbWAML0O (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:26:14 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Place for userland swsusp parts Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:25:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: Nigel Cunningham , kernel list References: <20060111221511.GA8223@elf.ucw.cz> <200601122113.24461.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060113002138.GE10088@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060113002138.GE10088@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601131225.51635.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Friday, 13 January 2006 01:21, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > > > > version control? > > > > > > > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > > > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > > > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > > > > > > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > > > > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > > > > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > > > > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > > > > uswsusp.sf.net? > > > > > > Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I > > > start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? > > > > I think I can host them (the box is moving tomorrow, hopefully, so it should get > > enough bandwidth ;-)), but I'm afraid I won't have time to set up a mailing list > > etc. > > Actually, it would probably be better to put it on sourceforge or > something like that. That way you don't have to care about sysadmin > stuff (mailing lists etc), backups, backup conectivity, etc, etc. Agreed. > > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. > > Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? Or create > userswsusp.sf.net (that name is ugly :-(). suspend.sf.net seems to be available. We can use it, I think. > ...some revision control would be nice, but perhaps revision control > is enough and we can just put git tree on kernel.org? IMHO quilt will suffice to manage patches, at least for starters, but we'll need a mailing list and an intro web page. Greetings, Rafael