From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422976AbWAMVWp (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:22:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422981AbWAMVWp (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:22:45 -0500 Received: from h144-158.u.wavenet.pl ([217.79.144.158]:54146 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422976AbWAMVWp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:22:45 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm] swsusp: userland interface Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:24:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: Ingo Oeser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM References: <200601122241.07363.rjw@sisk.pl> <200601132149.39159.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060113205927.GN1906@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060113205927.GN1906@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601132224.27529.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 13 January 2006 21:59, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Pá 13-01-06 21:49:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 13 January 2006 20:53, Ingo Oeser wrote: > > > On Friday 13 January 2006 00:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:09, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > +SNAPSHOT_IOCAVAIL_SWAP - check the amount of available swap (the last argument > > > > > > + should be a pointer to an unsigned int variable that will contain > > > > > > + the result if the call is successful) > > > > > > > > > > Is this good idea? It will overflow on 32-bit systems. Ammount of > > > > > available swap can be >4GB. [Or maybe it is in something else than > > > > > bytes, then you need to specify it.] > > > > > > > > It returns the number of pages. Well, it should be written explicitly, > > > > so I'll fix that. > > > > > > Please always talk to the kernel in bytes. Pagesize is only a kernel > > > internal unit. Sth. like off64_t is fine. > > > > These are values returned by the kernel, actually. Of course I can convert them > > to bytes before sending to the user space, if that's preferrable. > > > > Pavel, what do you think? > > Bytes, I'd say. It would be nice if preffered image size was in bytes, > too, for consistency. OK Rafael