mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tvec_bases too large for per-cpu data
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:58:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060124005806.7e9ab02e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D5F44C.76F0.0078.0@novell.com>

"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
> >- The `#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA' in init_timers_cpu() seems to be unnecessary -
> >  kmalloc_node() will use kmalloc() if !NUMA.
> 
> That is correct, but I wanted the fallback if kmalloc_node() fails (from briefly looking at that code it didn't
> seem like it would do such fallback itself). And calling kmalloc() twice if !NUMA seemed pointless.

I'm sorry, but how were we to know that?  Telepathy?

GFP_KERNEL for these size objects is pretty much infallible anyway, so I
wouldn't worry about it.  Or allocate all needed storage a little later in
boot with alloc_percpu().


> >- We prefer to do this:
> >
> >	if (expr) {
> >		...
> >	} else {
> >		...
> >	}
> >
> >  and not
> >
> >	if (expr) {
> >		...
> >	}
> >	else {
> >		...
> >	}
> 
> I can change that, too, but I don't see why this gets pointed out again and again when there really
> is no consistency across the entire kernel...
> 

We fix these things up when working on incorrectly laid-out code, but we
rarely bother raising a patch just to fix something like that.  We'll get
there eventually.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-24  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-18 13:11 Jan Beulich
2006-01-21  7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-23 10:31   ` Jan Beulich
2006-01-23 10:57     ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-24  8:33       ` Jan Beulich
2006-01-24  8:58         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-01-24 14:46           ` [PATCH] [SMP] reduce size of percpudata, and make sure per_cpu(object, not_possible_cpu) cause an invalid memory reference Eric Dumazet
2006-01-24 14:53             ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-01  9:21             ` [PATCH] [SMP] __GENERIC_PER_CPU changes Eric Dumazet
2006-01-30  8:43       ` [PATCH] tvec_bases too large for per-cpu data Jan Beulich
2006-01-31 22:27         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060124005806.7e9ab02e.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome