From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964949AbWA3UZa (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:25:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964952AbWA3UZa (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:25:30 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56247 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964949AbWA3UZ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:25:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:25:27 +0100 From: Olaf Hering To: Pekka Enberg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] record last user if malloc request is exact 4k Message-ID: <20060130202527.GB12315@suse.de> References: <20060130174919.GA7599@suse.de> <84144f020601301223j709ce2bco707ee73cf2d583b4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84144f020601301223j709ce2bco707ee73cf2d583b4@mail.gmail.com> X-DOS: I got your 640K Real Mode Right Here Buddy! X-Homeland-Security: You are not supposed to read this line! You are a terrorist! User-Agent: Mutt und vi sind doch schneller als Notes (und GroupWise) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 30, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi, > > On 1/30/06, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Is there a reason why a 4096 malloc is not recorded? > > untested patch below. > > > > allow SLAB_STORE_USER also with an exact 4k request. > > For architectures that have 4K pages, adding debugging overhead to 4K > objects is pretty much the worst case. Any particular reason you want > this? I'm just curious. -- short story of a lazy sysadmin: alias appserv=wotan