Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream...

[lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:51:08AM +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> In the not-too-distant future, there is likely to be a ram/disk price 
> inversion; ram becomes cheaper/mb than disk. At that point, we'll be buying 
> hardware based on "how much disk can I afford to provide power-off backup of 
> my ram?" rather than "how much ram can I afford?"

Hmm...

I resently bought a 250GB HD for my machine for $112, which is $0.50/GB
or $0.0005/MB.  I bought 512M ram for $55. which is $0.10/MB.  The ram
cost 200 times more per MB than the disk space.

In 1992 I got a 245MB HD for a new machine for $500 as far as I recall,
which was $2/MB.  I got 16MB ram for $800, which was $50/MB.  The ram
cost 25 times more than the disk space.

So just what kind of price trend are you looking at that will let you
get ram cheaper than disk space any time soon?  There has never been
such a trend yet as far as I know.  Maybe you have better data than me.
My experience shows the other direction.  Both memory and disk space are
much cheaper than they used to be, but the disk space has reduced in
price much faster than memory.

> At that point, things will change.

Sure, except I don't believe it will ever happen.

> Maybe, then, everything _will_ be in ram (with the kernel will intelligently 
> write out pages to the disk in the background, incase of power failure and 
> ready for a shutdown). Disk reads only ever occur during a power-on 
> population of ram.

Len Sorensen