mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JG <jg@cms.ac>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 100% cpu usage (kjournald, pdflush) with encrypted disks (dm-crypt)
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:07:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060201220752.382b1927@x90.0x4a47.net> (raw)

hi,

i've also posted this to dm-crypt mailing list, but here is some
additional info.

i've encrypted my hard disks (whole root, and other disks)
with "cryptsetup luksFormat --cipher aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 --key-size
256" and formatted them with ext3 (-j -m0 -O dir_index).

i'm using 2.6.15.1 kernel on an athlon xp 2400+ with 1GB RAM, VIA
KT400A/VT8237 chipset.

/proc/crypto for aes:
name         : aes
module       : kernel
type         : cipher
blocksize    : 16
min keysize  : 16
max keysize  : 32

i searched for the aes-i586 optimization (that should be in the
kernel?) but i found no other reference to it than
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=y. guess i'm using the asm optimized code as
there is no other AES option in the kernel.


if i copy files from one encrypted disk to another my cpu usage goes up
to 100% and stays there for the whole copy process. renicing cp itself
doesn't help. 

hdparm settings are the same for all disks except the SATA ones.
 multcount    = 16 (on)
 IO_support   =  3 (32-bit w/sync)
 unmaskirq    =  1 (on)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    = 256 (on)


kjournald and pdflush use all the cpu time, where kjournald is usually
at about 40-70% and pdflush goes up to 50-60%. this is while copying
large files. the cpu usage of kcryptd is negligible.

if i copy many small files, kcryptd will eat much more cpu, about
30-40% and the rest will be pdflush and kjournald.

all disks are mounted with -o defaults,noatime.

doing a 'mke2fs -j -m0 -O dir_index /dev/mapper/name' will also rise the
cpu usage to its maximum where pdflush takes about 60-70%.
(mke2fs 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) Using EXT2FS Library version 1.38)


is anyone else seeing this and is there a solution (besides using a
non-journalling fs) or do i have to live with it that encryption eats
all my cpu?

tx,
JG

             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-01 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-01 21:07 JG [this message]
2006-02-01 21:50 ` Gunter Ohrner
2006-02-02  8:30   ` JG

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060201220752.382b1927@x90.0x4a47.net \
    --to=jg@cms.ac \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®