From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750821AbWBFAmE (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:42:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750826AbWBFAmE (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:42:04 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:32927 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbWBFAmD (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:42:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:41:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] small cleanups Message-Id: <20060205164138.1cd61d5c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060205114229.GA3110@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060205114229.GA3110@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > > While hacking system stopping, I ran around few trivial places that > could be cleaned up... No code changes. > This patch is a bit too random for me. Sure, if you wnat to do a cleanup of signal.c and pdflush.c then feel free to do so, but I don't think this does it. It's just a little touchup of a couple of places. My concern is that we could apply 1000 patches like that. Would much prefer less, larger, more comprehensive patches.