From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750982AbWBFE5g (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2006 23:57:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750984AbWBFE5f (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2006 23:57:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:26770 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750978AbWBFE5f (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2006 23:57:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:57:09 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Hugh Dickins Cc: zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] stop ==== emergency Message-Id: <20060205205709.0b88171b.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:37:09 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins wrote: > +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-02-03 09:59:37.000000000 +0000 > @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static void show_trace_log_lvl(struct ta > stack = (unsigned long*)context->previous_esp; > if (!stack) > break; > - printk(KERN_EMERG " =======================\n"); > + printk(log_lvl); > + printk(" =======================\n"); > } This is wrong, Hugh. What do you think the priority of the second printk? It's not log_lvl, that's for sure. -- Pete