From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: ak@suse.de, pj@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOM behavior in constrained memory situations
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:10:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060206131026.53dbd8d5.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602061253020.18594@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
>
> There are situations in which memory allocations are restricted by policy,
> by a cpuset or by type of allocation.
>
> I propose that we need different OOM behavior for the cases in which the
> user has imposed a limit on what type of memory to be allocated. In that
> case the application should be terminate with OOM. The OOM killer should
> not run.
>
> The huge page allocator has already been modified to return a Bus Error
> because it would otherwise trigger the OOM killer. Its a bit strange
> if an app returns a Bus Error because it its out of memory.
>
> Could we modify the system so that the application requesting
> memory is terminated with an out of memory condition if
>
> 1. No huge pages are available anymore.
>
> 2. The application has set a policy that restricts allocation to
> certain nodes.
>
> 3. An application is restricted by a cpuset to certain nodes.
>
> 4. An application has requested large amounts of memory and the
> allocation fails.
>
> That should avoid the OOM killer in most situations.
Do we really want to kill the application? A more convetional response
would be to return NULL from the page allocator and let that trickle back.
The hugepage thing is special, because it's a pagefault, not a syscall.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-06 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-06 20:59 Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 21:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-02-06 21:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:25 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07 0:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-09 23:08 ` David Gibson
2006-02-06 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 22:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-07 0:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 1:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 9:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 18:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 19:00 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060206131026.53dbd8d5.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome