From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751148AbWBHWLP (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:11:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751149AbWBHWLP (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:11:15 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:59624 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751148AbWBHWLP (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:11:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:11:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20060208.141107.129210892.davem@davemloft.net> To: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adaplas@pol.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] atyfb sparc ifdefs From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Al Viro Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:01:43 +0000 > Date: 1133417630 -0500 > > ... should be sparc64 ones. > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro Probably CONFIG_SPARC64 is more appropriate. But I agree either way.