mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	dada1@cosmosbay.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	axboe@suse.de, anton@samba.org, wli@holomorphy.com, ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 05:40:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060208044041.GA9357@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602071107200.3854@g5.osdl.org>

> > I am looking at 2.6.16-rc1 and I don't see cpu_possible_map
> > being set in setup_smp()
> 
> You're right, my bad.  I looked at setup_smp() and how it walked through 
> every CPU in the firmware, but it doesn't actually ever set the possible 
> map, it fills in just hwrpb_cpu_present_mask (which is then then only used 
> _later_ to set cpu_possible_map for some silly reason).
> 
> As far as I can tell, "hwrpb_cpu_present_mask" is just wrong, and the code 
> _should_ be using cpu_possible_map.

We still have this one in init/main.c:

        /* Sets up cpus_possible() */
        smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);

That is actually why s390 is doing this in smp_prepare_cpus. We also use the
passed value of max_cpus to set the number of bits in cpu_possible_map
accordingly. This isn't possible anymore if this should be done in setup_arch.

So it looks like we have to switch to setup_arch and set NR_CPUS bits in
cpu_possible_map on s390.

Heiko

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-08  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200602051959.k15JxoHK001630@hera.kernel.org>
2006-02-07 15:15 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-07 15:31   ` Jens Axboe
2006-02-07 16:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-07 16:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 17:34       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07 17:48         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 18:30           ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-07 18:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-07 18:53               ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-07 19:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-08  4:40                   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2006-02-08  8:55                   ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2006-02-08 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09  3:05   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  3:08     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:36       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09  4:45         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:56           ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 16:08           ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 16:13             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 16:38               ` Rik van Riel
2006-02-09 16:59               ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 17:37               ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 10:05                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-10 10:13                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-11 14:49                     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-11 18:04                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-09 17:03             ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-09 17:23               ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-09 18:04               ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 18:52                 ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-09 20:37                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 21:03                     ` Ashok Raj
2006-02-10 10:02                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 10:42                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 11:09                     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-10 11:23                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 11:26                         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 14:13                         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-11  0:10                           ` Nathan Lynch
2006-02-11  0:25                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 12:10                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-10 19:08                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  4:39   ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09  4:46     ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-09  8:32 Chuck Ebbert
2006-02-09  8:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09  9:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09  9:11   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 10:08     ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 10:13       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 10:23         ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 10:31           ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-09 11:47             ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 12:46               ` Eric Dumazet
2006-02-09 13:12                 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-09 13:55                   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060208044041.GA9357@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome