From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965189AbWBIIqj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 03:46:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750828AbWBIIqj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 03:46:39 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:407 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750798AbWBIIqi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 03:46:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:46:09 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: MIke Galbraith Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [k2.6.16-rc1-mm5] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:302! Message-Id: <20060209004609.2120928a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1139473463.8028.13.camel@homer> References: <1139473463.8028.13.camel@homer> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIke Galbraith wrote: > > If I compile this kernel as SMP on my P4 box, I receive this BUG on > boot. Trying to start amaroK tipped me off that something was screwy, > and I thought it was some scheduler changes I'm working on, but I'm > innocent. The below is Virgin source. > > gzipped config attached. AmaroK isn't very happy after the BUG... and > neither is just about anything else it seems. Hopefully I'm not just > wasting electrons typing this :) We'll see. > > -Mike > > kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:302! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] > PREEMPT SMP > last sysfs file: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:09.0/subsystem_device > Modules linked in: xt_pkttype ipt_LOG xt_limit snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss button battery snd_seq snd_seq_device ac edd ip6t_REJECT xt_tcpudp ipt_REJECT xt_state iptable_mangle iptable_nat ip_nat iptable_filter ip6table_mangle ip_conntrack ip_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables tda9887 at76c651 prism54 saa7134 ohci1394 ieee1394 bt878 ir_kbd_i2c snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec snd_ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 tuner bttv video_buf firmware_class btcx_risc ir_common tveeprom nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 nls_utf8 sd_mod fan thermal processor > CPU: 0 > EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted VLI > EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.16-rc1-mm5 #1) > EIP is at release_pages+0x165/0x196 > eax: 00000000 ebx: c16f3220 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000008 > esi: c18077d0 edi: c18077b4 ebp: 00000000 esp: f6644e74 > ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 > Process knotify (pid: 7482, threadinfo=f6644000 task=f658b030) > Stack: <0>00000008 00000008 00000001 00000000 00000000 c161e920 c161e940 c161e960 > c161e980 c161e9a0 c057f600 f6644edc 00000001 00000002 f6644ed4 c01446de > c161e9a0 c18077d0 00000008 c16f32e0 c18077d0 00000008 00000008 c01521b5 > Call Trace: > __pagevec_free+0x1f/0x2e free_pages_and_swap_cache+0x74/0xb6 > unmap_vmas+0x5da/0x642 unmap_region+0xa7/0x131 > do_munmap+0x139/0x1cc sys_munmap+0x40/0x59 Doesn't happen here (but it never does). Is it always knotify, always dying in the same manner?