From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support HDIO_GETGEO on device-mapper volumes
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:53:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060210145348.GA12173@agk.surrey.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43EBEDD0.60608@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:35:12PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Since dm doesn't implement the HDIO_GETGEO ioctl,
Why should it? Device-mapper constructs a virtual device and
I think it's completely wrong for it to 'fake' a geometry.
Of course dm could recognise the ioctl - but the default response
should be the one that indicates the geometry is unknown.
> grub assumes that the CHS
> geometry is 620/128/63, which makes it impossible to configure it to
> boot a filesystem that lives beyond the 2GB mark, even if the system
> BIOS supports that.
Surely a problem in grub, not the kernel?
> The attached patch implements a simple ioctl handler that supplies a
> compatible geometry when HDIO_GETGEO is called against a device-mapper
> device. Its behavior is somewhat similar to what sd_mod does if the
> scsi controller doesn't provide its own geometry.
What if the dm device is a linear mapping to an sd device that *does*
provide a different geometry? Then the 'fake' geometry dm would return
with this patch would be wrong!
> this seems to be a better option than having each program make
> up its own potentially different geometry, or making an arbitrary guess.
I disagree - either dm should work out the *correct* geometry to
return for those mappings where a geometry is known and it's sensible
to return one (e.g. linear mapping to the start of certain scsi
devices), or else it should leave it to userspace to decide how to
handle the situation. (And there's nothing currently stopping
userspace seeing that a dm device is constructed out of a scsi device
and choosing to use the geometry of that underlying device.)
Alasdair
--
agk@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-10 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-10 1:35 Darrick J. Wong
2006-02-10 2:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 5:15 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 8:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-02-10 15:14 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 14:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon [this message]
2006-02-10 15:12 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 20:27 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-10 21:21 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-20 18:09 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-20 21:30 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-21 13:30 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-02-21 16:02 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-10 15:13 ` [PATCH] " Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060210145348.GA12173@agk.surrey.redhat.com \
--to=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®