From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750785AbWBLKp7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:45:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750796AbWBLKp7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:45:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:45468 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbWBLKp6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:45:58 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:45:08 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: xose.vazquez@gmail.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: old patches in -mm Message-Id: <20060212024508.117d4603.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <43EE415F.2000805@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > hi, > > > > There are 35 patches(not included reiser4 and post-halloween-doc) older > > than 2 months that still are not in mainline. Forgotten or experimental ? > > > > > > 2.6-sony_acpi4.patch > > > Forgotten, I think. This one showed no problems for me until now. > The ACPI guys don't like machine-specific drivers like this, apparently - features are supposed to be controlled via the machine's BIOS ACPI methods. But given the state of Sony ACPI documentaion (ie: none) that might not work out. I'll ask about it.