From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] hrtimer: round up relative start time on low-res arches
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:19:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060215091959.GB1376@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602150033150.30994@scrub.home>
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > CONFIG_TIME_LOW_RES is a temporary way for architectures to signal that
> > they simply return xtime in do_gettimeoffset(). In this corner-case we
> > want to round up by resolution when starting a relative timer, to avoid
> > short timeouts. This will go away with the GTOD framework.
>
> This fixes the worst cases. Even the common case should somehow
> reflect that the relative start time should be rounded up in the same
> way (even if not by that much), e.g. due to rounding the current
> get_time() (at least for the non TIME_INTERPOLATION case) has a 1usec
> resolution, which should be added there.
yeah, agreed. That will be accurately fixed via GTOD's per-hwclock
resolution values. It will have another advantage as well: e.g. the
whole of m68k wont be penalized via CONFIG_TIME_LOW_RES for having a
handful of sub-arches (Apollo, Sun3x, Q40) that dont have a higher
resolution timer - every clock can define its own resolution. You could
help that effort by porting m68k to use GTOD ;-)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-15 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-13 1:09 [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time Roman Zippel
2006-02-13 10:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-13 11:25 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-13 13:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-13 13:42 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-13 14:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-13 15:49 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-13 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-13 22:29 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-14 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-14 10:18 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-14 12:20 ` [patch] hrtimer: round up relative start time on low-res arches Ingo Molnar
2006-02-14 21:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-15 0:30 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-15 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-02-15 12:26 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-15 20:43 ` john stultz
2006-02-16 14:10 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-16 19:06 ` john stultz
2006-02-16 23:44 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-17 0:28 ` john stultz
2006-02-17 15:02 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 01/13] hrtimer: round up relative start time Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060215091959.GB1376@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®