From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Severe problem with e1000 driver in 2.4.31/32 (at least)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:39:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060216203948.5953a1e9.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
Hello,
today we had to experience a bug in e1000 network driver on this type of
network card (a current PCI e1000 sold everywhere):
02:07.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 107c (rev 05)
Subsystem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1376
Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 18
Memory at f9000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Memory at f9020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
I/O ports at a800 [size=64]
Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
Capabilities: [e4] PCI-X non-bridge device.
We can simply crash the box (2.4.32 stock kernel, 2.4.31 is the same) by
performing this:
1) Boot box with network physically disconnected
2) start pinging some host somewhere, you get "unreachable", let it run
3) connect the network and await some ping replies.
4) disconnect the network again
5) box is dead
The box runs into a BUG in e1000_hw.c line 5052. The BUG shows up because the
code is obviously executed inside an interrupt, which seems not intended.
As this BUG is always reproducable and pretty annoying we made this pretty bad
workaround:
In e1000_osdep.h replace:
#define msec_delay(x) do { if(in_interrupt()) { \
/* Don't mdelay in interrupt context! */ \
BUG(); \
} else { \
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
schedule_timeout((x * HZ)/1000 + 2); \
} } while(0)
with
#define msec_delay(x) do { if(in_interrupt()) { \
/* Don't mdelay in interrupt context! */ \
mdelay(x); \
} else { \
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
schedule_timeout((x * HZ)/1000 + 2); \
} } while(0)
Obviously this is not a solution, but it saves the world at least. This is why
I offer no applyable patch.
Someone with inside knowledge of this driver should take a look why
e1000_config_dsp_after_link_change in e1000_hw.c is executed in interrupt
context. Btw I don't know if this shows up in 2.6 either.
--
Regards,
Stephan
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-16 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-16 19:39 Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
[not found] ` <4807377b0602161342l4b46fa3cu26a007789ba08443@mail.gmail.com>
2006-02-16 21:49 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-02-17 13:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060216203948.5953a1e9.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome