From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
Cc: penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, gregkh@suse.de, bunk@stusta.de,
rml@novell.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
johnstul@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:33:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060221153305.5d0b123f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060221225718.GA12480@vrfy.org>
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:51:01AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:02 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > If you revert this one patch, on top of a clean 2.6.16-rc4, do things
> > > start working for you again?
> >
> > Okey dokey, bisecting with mrproper took little longer than expected but
> > I found the bad changeset:
Thanks - it helps heaps.
> > 033b96fd30db52a710d97b06f87d16fc59fee0f1 is first bad commit
> > diff-tree 033b96fd30db52a710d97b06f87d16fc59fee0f1 (from 0f76e5acf9dc788e664056dda1e461f0bec93948)
> > Author: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
> > Date: Fri Nov 11 06:09:55 2005 +0100
> >
> > [PATCH] remove mount/umount uevents from superblock handling
>
> Upgrade HAL, it's too old for that kernel.
>
We broke back-compatibility. The changelog _failed to tell us_ that we
were breaking back-compatibility. The patch wouldn't have been applied if
we'd been told that. At least, not without a lot of careful thought.
The fact that the changelog failed to tell us this makes one suspect that
the breakage was inadvertent.
So no, upgrading HAL is not a good answer. Please fix the kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-21 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-17 22:45 Linux 2.6.16-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-02-17 23:14 ` 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-02-19 11:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-19 14:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-19 17:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-19 21:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-20 1:02 ` Greg KH
2006-02-20 7:08 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-21 22:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-21 22:57 ` Kay Sievers
2006-02-21 23:33 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-02-22 0:04 ` Kay Sievers
2006-02-22 0:15 ` Mark Lord
2006-02-22 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-22 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 0:46 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-22 1:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 11:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-22 14:25 ` uswsusp & initrd -- was " Pavel Machek
2006-02-22 15:48 ` Joel Becker
2006-02-22 16:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-22 17:33 ` Gabor Gombas
2006-02-22 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 18:37 ` Christian Trefzer
2006-02-22 18:59 ` Joel Becker
2006-02-22 19:18 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 19:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-22 19:40 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 20:45 ` Jens Axboe
2006-02-22 22:51 ` Greg KH
2006-02-23 6:39 ` Jens Axboe
2006-02-23 17:29 ` Martin Bligh
2006-02-23 17:52 ` Greg KH
2006-02-23 18:01 ` Martin Bligh
2006-02-23 18:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 20:26 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-24 23:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-22 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-22 20:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-22 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-22 20:26 ` Greg KH
2006-02-23 5:28 ` Jody McIntyre
2006-02-22 20:57 ` Diego Calleja
2006-02-22 21:19 ` Russell King
2006-02-22 21:30 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 20:47 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-22 19:07 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 17:06 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-23 12:36 ` Paulo Marques
2006-02-22 10:49 ` Diego Calleja
2006-02-22 7:06 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-22 15:27 ` Kay Sievers
2006-02-22 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 16:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-22 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-22 17:17 ` sysfs regressions (was: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions) Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 17:47 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 16:18 ` 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions David Zeuthen
2006-02-22 16:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-22 16:46 ` David Zeuthen
2006-02-22 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-22 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-22 18:04 ` Al Viro
2006-02-23 3:01 ` John Stoffel
2006-02-22 17:51 ` Al Viro
2006-02-22 17:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-22 18:10 ` Al Viro
2006-02-22 19:25 ` David Zeuthen
2006-02-22 17:10 ` Al Viro
2006-02-22 17:10 ` grundig
2006-02-22 17:14 ` Martin Bligh
2006-02-23 4:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-22 18:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-22 8:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-17 23:27 ` Linux 2.6.16-rc4 Nigel Cunningham
2006-02-18 8:59 ` Edmondo Tommasina
2006-02-18 9:19 ` Gene Heskett
2006-02-18 10:20 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-18 11:26 ` Gene Heskett
2006-02-18 16:04 ` Jean Delvare
2006-02-22 22:02 ` Linux 2.6.16-rc4 edac oops Mark Rustad
2006-02-24 11:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-22 2:39 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions Yu, Luming
2006-02-22 3:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-22 6:55 Yu, Luming
2006-02-22 12:23 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060221153305.5d0b123f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®