From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751321AbWCAWY3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:24:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751094AbWCAWY2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:24:28 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:3970 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328AbWCAWY1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:24:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:26:31 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Greg KH Cc: pj@sgi.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Zhang, Yanmin" Subject: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Message-Id: <20060301142631.22738f2d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060301213048.GA17251@kroah.com> References: <20060228183610.5253feb9.akpm@osdl.org> <20060228194525.0faebaaa.pj@sgi.com> <20060228201040.34a1e8f5.pj@sgi.com> <20060228212501.25464659.pj@sgi.com> <20060228234807.55f1b25f.pj@sgi.com> <20060301002631.48e3800e.akpm@osdl.org> <20060301015338.b296b7ad.pj@sgi.com> <20060301192103.GA14320@kroah.com> <20060301125802.cce9ef51.pj@sgi.com> <20060301213048.GA17251@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:58:02PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > > Greg wrote: > > > As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi > > > being bad :) > > > > Yeah - so I eventually realized. > > > > > > [] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0 > > > > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120 > > > > [] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0 > > > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0 > > > > [] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120 > > > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0 > > > > > > This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in > > > my tree... > > > > So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this? > > Hm, looks like that stuff went into mainline already, sorry I thought it > was still in -mm. > > Look at changeset 69dcc99199fe29b0a29471a3488d39d9d33b25fc for details. But Paul bisected it down to a particular not-merged patch, gregkh-driver-allow-sysfs-attribute-files-to-be-pollable.patch, which I'll admit doesn't look like it'll cause this. Paul, did you test http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.16-rc5-mm2-pre1.gz? That has the sysfs-pollable patches reverted. > I've cced Yanmin, who did that work. You missed. I've added Yanmin now.