From: Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: 2.6.15.4: NFS-related BUG in radix_tree_tag_set()
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:05:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060302130512.GA23671@roonstrasse.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1356 bytes --]
Hi,
after a kernel upgrade from 2.6.11 to 2.6.15.4, we were experiencing
crashes on all four web servers. These web servers obtain their data
from NFSv3 from a NetApp server. The servers were under heavy load -
mostly reading, but also a lot of writing to NFS.
Hardware: Compaq ProLiant with two (physical) Xeon 2.4 CPUs, 4 GB
memory, Broadcom Tigon3 network interfaces. Kernel config is appended
to this mail.
After one of the crashes, an administrator made a screenshot
(http://www.duempel.org/~max/linux/nfs_radix_tree_crash.png) and
rebooted. Unfortunately, part of the stack trace is missing (25 lines
console only), and I had no access to the KDB console. I am currently
waiting for the next crash to happen so I can provide more
information.
The BUG_ON() failed in lib/radix-tree.c:372 :
slot = slot->slots[offset];
BUG_ON(slot == NULL);
I believe the missing stack trace calls are nfs_mark_request_dirty(),
nfs_flush_one(), nfs_flush_list(), nfs_flush_inode().
That would mean that req->wb_index was somehow removed from
nfsi->nfs_page_tree, maybe in another thread on another CPU? I see
the spinlock nfsi->req_lock is only held for very short timespans - is
it possible that another CPU tries to flush the same NFS write request
which is currently in the middle of being handled by the first CPU?
Any other explanation?
Max
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 7001 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-02 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 13:05 Max Kellermann [this message]
2006-03-02 13:32 ` Max Kellermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060302130512.GA23671@roonstrasse.net \
--to=max@duempel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome