From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rlrevell@joe-job.com
Cc: bcollins@ubuntu.com, torvalds@osdl.org, zdzichu@irc.pl,
gregkh@suse.de, bunk@stusta.de, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 13:07:25 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060309.130725.42147030.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141937556.13319.64.camel@mindpipe>
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:52:35 -0500
> Ubuntu doesn't provide a UP 686 kernel?
>
> Isn't there a performance hit running an SMP kernel on UP?
There is some cost, but it is mitigated by a patch they include
which nops out all the spinlocks when a UP system is detected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 22:35 Greg KH
2006-03-06 22:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-06 23:00 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 22:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-08 22:50 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 23:18 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 18:40 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-03-09 19:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 20:10 ` Ben Collins
2006-03-09 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-15 16:03 ` Ben Collins
2006-03-09 20:52 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-09 21:06 ` SMP on UP (Was Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5) Ben Collins
2006-03-09 21:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-09 21:07 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2006-03-09 20:37 ` State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5 Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-09 20:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-09 21:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-08 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 23:45 ` Dave Hansen
2006-03-08 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-09 10:24 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2006-03-08 23:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-08 23:18 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 23:23 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 23:34 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 23:40 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 0:03 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 23:21 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 4:01 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-09 5:34 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 5:11 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060309.130725.42147030.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcollins@ubuntu.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zdzichu@irc.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome