From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dim@openvz.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, akpm@osdl.org, dev@openvz.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: {get|set}sockopt compat layer
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:29:34 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060309.152934.99760924.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603091324.00362.dim@openvz.org>
From: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:23:59 +0300
> Hello, Arnd!
>
> > For the compat_ioctl stuff, we don't have the function pointer inside an
> > #ifdef, the overhead is relatively small since there is only one of these
> > structures per module implementing a protocol, but it avoids having to
> > rebuild everything when changing CONFIG_COMPAT.
> >
> > It's probably not a big issue either way, maybe davem has a stronger
> > opinion on it either way.
> >
> Done.
I think this looks fine but it doesn't apply cleanly to the
current net-2.6.17 tree.
Could you cook up a fresh patch, and send it with a complete
changelog entry and appropriate Signed-off-by: lines?
Thanks a lot Dmitry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-20 8:10 [PATCH 1/2] iptables 32bit " Mishin Dmitry
2006-02-20 8:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Mishin Dmitry
2006-02-20 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] " David S. Miller
2006-02-20 15:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-02-21 9:04 ` [Devel] " Dmitry Mishin
2006-02-21 11:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-03-07 14:07 ` {get|set}sockopt " Dmitry Mishin
2006-03-07 15:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-03-09 10:23 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-03-09 23:29 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2006-03-10 11:21 ` [PATCH] {get|set}sockopt compatibility layer Dmitry Mishin
2006-03-10 11:34 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-20 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] iptables 32bit compat layer Andi Kleen
2006-02-21 9:24 ` [Devel] " Dmitry Mishin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060309.152934.99760924.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=dim@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome