From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751644AbWCIVPj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:15:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751660AbWCIVPj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:15:39 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:31502 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751617AbWCIVPi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:15:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:15:02 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Roland Dreier Cc: "Bryan O'Sullivan" , rolandd@cisco.com, gregkh@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18 of 20] ipath - kbuild infrastructure Message-ID: <20060309211502.GA24460@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <20060309185604.GA24004@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:00:07AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Sam> Eventually - yes. But not just now. Kbuild was introduced > Sam> because it was needed in the top-level directory and it made > Sam> good sense to do so. But for now keeping Makefile is a good > Sam> choice. This is anyway what people are used to. > > OK, disregard my suggestion then. Should we patch > Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt to correct the current > documentation, which says: > > The preferred name for the kbuild files is 'Kbuild' but 'Makefile' > will continue to be supported. All new developmen is expected to use > the Kbuild filename. > Yes - I will do so. Thanks. Sam