From: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>,
Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PNP: adjust pnp_register_driver signature
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:19:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314061938.GB22354@neo.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603021601.27467.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:01:27PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This series of patches removes the assumption that pnp_register_driver()
> returns the number of devices claimed. Returning the count is unreliable
> because devices may be hot-plugged in the future. (Many devices don't
> support hot-plug, of course, but PNP in general does.)
>
> This changes the convention to "zero for success, or a negative error
> value," which matches pci_register_driver(), acpi_bus_register_driver(),
> and platform_driver_register().
>
> If drivers need to know the number of devices, they can count calls
> to their .probe() methods.
Andrew, I'd appreciate if you add this to mainline when it's convenient to
make non-critical changes.
Thanks,
Adam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 23:01 Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/9] parport: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] mpu401: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 3/9] cs4236: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 4/9] opl3sa2: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] ns558: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-03 12:55 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2006-03-03 15:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] i8042: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-14 5:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] IRDA: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] cs4232: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] PNP: " Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-14 6:19 ` Adam Belay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314061938.GB22354@neo.rr.com \
--to=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome