From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>,
Jun OKAJIMA <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks 2
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:31:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603171831.46811.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603171717.23288.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Friday 17 March 2006 07:17, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:46 pm, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:28 pm, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > Ok here is a kind of directed memory reclaim for swsusp which is
> > > different to ordinary memory reclaim. It reclaims memory in up to 4
> > > passes with just shrink_zone, without hooking into balance_pgdat thereby
> > > simplifying that function as well.
>
> > It may need to be made more aggressive with another reclaim mapped pass to
> > ensure it frees enough memory. That would be trivial to add.
>
> Indeed this was true after a few more suspend resume cycles. Here is a rework
> which survived many suspend resume cycles. This worked nicely in combination
> with the aggressive swap prefetch tunable being set on resume.
>
> Ok, now please test :) Patch for 2.6.16-rc6-mm1
>
> Cheers,
> Con
> ---
}-- snip --{
I'm not an mm expert, but I like that.
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2006-03-17 16:44:47.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2006-03-17 16:45:11.000000000 +1100
> @@ -173,9 +173,6 @@ void free_all_swap_pages(int swap, struc
> * Notice: all userland should be stopped before it is called, or
> * livelock is possible.
> */
> -
> -#define SHRINK_BITE 10000
> -
> int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
> {
> long size, tmp;
> @@ -195,13 +192,12 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
> if (!is_highmem(zone))
> tmp -= zone->free_pages;
> if (tmp > 0) {
> - tmp = shrink_all_memory(SHRINK_BITE);
> + tmp = shrink_all_memory(tmp);
> if (!tmp)
> return -ENOMEM;
> pages += tmp;
> - } else if (size > image_size / PAGE_SIZE) {
If you drop this, swsusp can free less memory than you want (image_size is
ignored). Generally we want it to free memory until
size <= image_size / PAGE_SIZE.
Appended is a fix on top of your patch (untested).
> - tmp = shrink_all_memory(SHRINK_BITE);
> - pages += tmp;
> + if (pages > size)
> + break;
> }
> printk("\b%c", p[i++%4]);
> } while (tmp > 0);
kernel/power/swsusp.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
@@ -191,13 +191,13 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
for_each_zone (zone)
if (!is_highmem(zone))
tmp -= zone->free_pages;
+ if (tmp <= 0)
+ tmp = size - image_size / PAGE_SIZE;
if (tmp > 0) {
tmp = shrink_all_memory(tmp);
if (!tmp)
return -ENOMEM;
pages += tmp;
- if (pages > size)
- break;
}
printk("\b%c", p[i++%4]);
} while (tmp > 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-17 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-10 17:04 Faster resuming of suspend technology Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11 7:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-11 12:17 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11 12:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-12 9:26 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-12 17:54 ` Jim Crilly
2006-03-12 23:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-20 12:45 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-21 11:33 ` Fwd: " Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-27 23:57 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-28 0:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 12:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2006-03-12 21:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-12 22:30 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13 1:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-13 10:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-14 10:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:35 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13 10:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:13 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-13 11:36 ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was Re: [ck] Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.] Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 12:03 ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was " Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 5:13 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 8:24 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-14 11:51 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 12:33 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 17:36 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 21:34 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 18:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-14 21:45 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-15 10:37 ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was " Stefan Seyfried
2006-03-15 17:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-15 21:32 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-16 10:33 ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 10:47 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 21:33 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 21:44 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-17 4:28 ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks was: " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17 4:46 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17 6:17 ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks 2 Con Kolivas
2006-03-17 17:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2006-03-18 4:14 ` [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks Con Kolivas
2006-03-18 4:41 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18 4:46 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18 4:52 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18 4:56 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18 5:44 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18 6:14 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18 8:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18 9:40 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:55 ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Andreas Mohr
2006-03-17 5:23 ` 2.6.16-rc6: swsusp cannot find swap partition Mark Lord
2006-03-17 5:34 ` Mark Lord
2006-03-16 11:31 ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 2:20 ` swsusp_suspend continues? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 9:19 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 16:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603171831.46811.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=seife@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®