mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>,
	Jun OKAJIMA <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
	Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks 2
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:31:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603171831.46811.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603171717.23288.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Friday 17 March 2006 07:17, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:46 pm, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:28 pm, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > Ok here is a kind of directed memory reclaim for swsusp which is
> > > different to ordinary memory reclaim. It reclaims memory in up to 4
> > > passes with just shrink_zone, without hooking into balance_pgdat thereby
> > > simplifying that function as well.
> 
> > It may need to be made more aggressive with another reclaim mapped pass to
> > ensure it frees enough memory. That would be trivial to add.
> 
> Indeed this was true after a few more suspend resume cycles. Here is a rework
> which survived many suspend resume cycles. This worked nicely in combination
> with the aggressive swap prefetch tunable being set on resume.
> 
> Ok, now please test :) Patch for 2.6.16-rc6-mm1
> 
> Cheers,
> Con
> ---
}-- snip --{

I'm not an mm expert, but I like that.

> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2006-03-17 16:44:47.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2006-03-17 16:45:11.000000000 +1100
> @@ -173,9 +173,6 @@ void free_all_swap_pages(int swap, struc
>   *	Notice: all userland should be stopped before it is called, or
>   *	livelock is possible.
>   */
> -
> -#define SHRINK_BITE	10000
> -
>  int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
>  {
>  	long size, tmp;
> @@ -195,13 +192,12 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
>  			if (!is_highmem(zone))
>  				tmp -= zone->free_pages;
>  		if (tmp > 0) {
> -			tmp = shrink_all_memory(SHRINK_BITE);
> +			tmp = shrink_all_memory(tmp);
>  			if (!tmp)
>  				return -ENOMEM;
>  			pages += tmp;
> -		} else if (size > image_size / PAGE_SIZE) {

If you drop this, swsusp can free less memory than you want (image_size is
ignored).  Generally we want it to free memory until
size <= image_size / PAGE_SIZE.

Appended is a fix on top of your patch (untested).

> -			tmp = shrink_all_memory(SHRINK_BITE);
> -			pages += tmp;
> +			if (pages > size)
> +				break;
>  		}
>  		printk("\b%c", p[i++%4]);
>  	} while (tmp > 0);

 kernel/power/swsusp.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
@@ -191,13 +191,13 @@ int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
 		for_each_zone (zone)
 			if (!is_highmem(zone))
 				tmp -= zone->free_pages;
+		if (tmp <= 0)
+			tmp = size - image_size / PAGE_SIZE;
 		if (tmp > 0) {
 			tmp = shrink_all_memory(tmp);
 			if (!tmp)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			pages += tmp;
-			if (pages > size)
-				break;
 		}
 		printk("\b%c", p[i++%4]);
 	} while (tmp > 0);

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-17 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-10 17:04 Faster resuming of suspend technology Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11  7:22 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-11 12:17   ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-11 12:46     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-12  9:26       ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-12 17:54         ` Jim Crilly
2006-03-12 23:06           ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-20 12:45             ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-21 11:33               ` Fwd: " Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-27 23:57                 ` Jun OKAJIMA
2006-03-28  0:28                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 12:48                     ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2006-03-12 21:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-12 22:30   ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13  1:43     ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-13 10:12       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:10         ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-14 10:32           ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:06   ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 10:35     ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-13 10:43       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 11:13         ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-13 11:36           ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was Re: [ck] Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.] Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 12:03             ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was " Con Kolivas
2006-03-14  5:13               ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14  8:24                 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-03-14 11:51                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 12:33                   ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 12:43                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-14 17:36                   ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 21:34                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-14 18:06               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-14 21:45                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-15 10:37             ` does swsusp suck aftre resume for you? [was " Stefan Seyfried
2006-03-15 17:59               ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-15 21:32                 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-16 10:33                 ` does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:46                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 10:47                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:50                       ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 21:33                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 21:44                           ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 22:15                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-17  4:28                             ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks was: " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17  4:46                               ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2006-03-17  6:17                                 ` [PATCH] swsusp reclaim tweaks 2 Con Kolivas
2006-03-17 17:31                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2006-03-18  4:14                                     ` [PATCH][RFC] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:41                                       ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:46                                         ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  4:52                                           ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  4:56                                             ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  5:44                                               ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  6:14                                                 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  8:30                                                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-18  9:40                                                     ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-16 10:55                     ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Andreas Mohr
2006-03-17  5:23                     ` 2.6.16-rc6: swsusp cannot find swap partition Mark Lord
2006-03-17  5:34                       ` Mark Lord
2006-03-16 11:31                   ` [ck] Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16  2:20               ` swsusp_suspend continues? Con Kolivas
2006-03-16  9:19                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16 16:12                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200603171831.46811.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=seife@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®