From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932152AbWCZWkx (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:40:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932153AbWCZWkx (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:40:53 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:14350 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932152AbWCZWkw (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:40:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:26:39 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Andrew Morton Cc: Nigel Cunningham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make libata not powerdown drivers on PM_EVENT_FREEZE. Message-ID: <20060322232638.GA2375@ucw.cz> References: <200603232151.47346.ncunningham@cyclades.com> <20060323040649.3a6c96f1.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060323040649.3a6c96f1.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Gi! > > At the moment libata doesn't pass pm_message_t down ata_device_suspend. > > This causes drives to be powered down when we just want a freeze, > > causing unnecessary wear and tear. This patch gets pm_message_t passed > > down so that it can be used to determine whether to power down the > > drive. > > Does this explain http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 ? > > This might be 2.6.16.1 material - how irritating is it? I'd say patch is okay for mainline, but not worth it for 2.6.16.1 --- we have lived with similar problem for quite a long time for PATA. -- Thanks, Sharp!